Advertisement

advertisement

Ray's article

advertisement

In the mid 1970’s Bernie Sanders was the chairman of the Liberty Union Party, which was a Vermont spinoff group from the Socialist People’s Party. According to interviews obtained by The Daily Beast and other news sources, as chairman of this self-described “radical political party” Sanders, repeatedly compared Vermont white workers to enslaved black people.


In one 1976 conversation, Sanders told a local newspaper that the sale of a privately held mining company by its founders, a company that employed mostly white workers, reminded him of “the days of slavery, when black people were sold to different owners without their consent,” and compared the service economy to chattel slavery.



Reports also show that in a 1977 interview Sanders went on to compare the state of Vermont’s majority all-white population to black slaves, due to the fact that the majority of white’s working in the state were working in the low paying service industry. In the interview Sanders says “Basically, today, Vermont workers remain slaves in many, many ways,” he went on to say, “The problem comes when we end up with an entire state of people trained to wait on other people.”


Yet throughout Sanders political career he has not reciprocated this same sentiment when it comes to black workers, the very descendants of the American chattel slaves who founded the country.

Lately, Sanders arrogance toward the history of American chattel slavery, has been very bold, contradictory, and completely absent when it comes to addressing the plight that black Americans are burdened with as a result of the atrocity their ancestors endured.


And although Sanders has stated that the United States was founded on “racist principles” and has called for an end to “physical, political, legal, economic, and environmental” violence against those who he vaguely describes as “Americans of color,” Sanders has all but ignored black workers specifically, the direct descendants of the chattel slaves he loved to compare his white Vermont voters too.
 


“The problem comes when we end up with an entire state of people trained to wait on other people.” - Bernie Sanders

Today, the black American descendants of chattel slavery account for a disproportionate amount of low-paying service jobs, such as cashiers, call-center operators, food service workers, security guards, and temp workers  across the states, as compared to higher status jobs paying a living wage, such as the one’s Sanders fought for in Vermont.


The U.S. Labor department is projecting that the service industry which heavily employs black workers is primed to lose millions of jobs over the next 10 years. Projections show that employment in the ‘Office and Administration support occupations’ alone will lose over 600,000 jobs over the next 8 years, and that’s by modest standards. 


Other occupations such as customer service reps and front line sales people are also expected to take heavy job loses as technology is expected to substitute or completely take over functions that over 25% of black workers traditionally perform.


As the overall labor force participation rate for black workers, like the rate for all race groups, is projected to decline by the year 2026, no single gender/race group is expected to  decline more significantly over the next 8 year than the rate for black men in the U.S. labor force.


Bernie Sanders compelling ignorance of this major issue of unemployment and underemployment plaguing specifically black male descendants of chattel slavery is causing an uneven accord among black voters, who believe that Sanders is playing dumb on the issues, or is just plain out spearheading the demise of black male descendants by completely ignoring their issues.



Sanders who claims to be a champion of fighting income and wealth inequality since before some of his Democratic rivals were born, and regularly brags about being jailed while attending a King rally during the civil rights era, exhibits the thought patterns of what the late Dr. Martin Luther King described as a ‘white moderate.’


Dr. King wrote the following about 'white moderates' in his 1963 letters from a Birmingham Jail –


“I must make two honest confessions to you, my Christian and Jewish brothers. First, I must confess that over the past few years I have been gravely disappointed with the white moderate. I have almost reached the regrettable conclusion that the Negro's great stumbling block in his stride toward freedom is not the White Citizen's Counciler or the Ku Klux Klanner, but the white moderate, who is more devoted to "order" than to justice; who prefers a negative peace which is the absence of tension to a positive peace which is the presence of justice; who constantly says: "I agree with you in the goal you seek, but I cannot agree with your methods of direct action"; who paternalistically believes he can set the timetable for another man's freedom; who lives by a mythical concept of time and who constantly advises the Negro to wait for a "more convenient season." Shallow understanding from people of good will is more frustrating than absolute misunderstanding from people of ill will. Lukewarm acceptance is much more bewildering than outright rejection.”



One occupation that black men in this land have consistently worked in since before the founding of America is construction. As black chattel slaves, not service workers like those in Bernie’s Vermont, black men & women worked as unpaid free labor, under torturous conditions, and practically built the cornerstones of the American infrastructure we enjoy today.


Historically, after the abolishment of chattel slavery in America, white American workers quickly organized labor unions, and sieged on the opportunity to corner the labor market for industrialist, by consolidating the work force under their unilateral control for the betterment of the ‘white working man.’


Sanders, a good ole boy representing Vermont, who plays possum of the subject of reparations, and the ill effect of America’s blood stained past of chattel slavery, is unequivocally a big time labor union supporter, and is very imaginative when it comes to ways he can directly help promote their interest.




For example, Bernie proposes “card check,” the process by which unions can easily organize a worksite and also supports bailing out underfunded union pension plans by raising taxes on wealthy Americans.


Sanders proposed ‘Keep Our Pension Promises Act’ which targets so-called multi-employer pension plans, typically run by construction unions. Nearly a third of these construction union pension plans are seriously underfunded and heading toward insolvency, for reasons such as failure of their unions trustees to invest wisely.


Yet while Bernie expresses his attentiveness and concern for majority white construction labor unions, and as employment in the construction labor market is expected to grow much faster than all other areas of occupation over the next decade, many black workers, particularly the sons of those that built the nation, black male descendants of chattel slavery, are all but denied traditional access to high paying construction union trades.


In exchange for careers as skilled tradesmen, the majority of black men entering the construction trade unions are herded into what Calvin Clinton, the President of the African American Workers Union (AAWU) describes as the ‘Jim Crow Construction Scheme,’ comprised of ‘pre-apprenticeships’  and ‘Title 3’ work force initiatives that far too often leads black workers back to unemployment lines. 


The practice of immediately firing or laying off black construction workers once local hiring requirements have been satisfied, or the project has ended, which ever comes first, is commonly referred to in the industry as the 'One & Done' policy. The 'One & Done' policy is responsible for deterring thousand of black construction workers from become professional tradespeople. 


VIDEO: Calvin K. Clinton, President of AAWU explains the 'Jim Crow Construction Scheme' 




Senator Sanders who has been very imaginative when creating solutions for his state, labor unions, and immigrant workers,  has not yet written nor sponsored any legislation that would drastically help struggling black descendants of American slavery, being victimized by the discriminatory practices of the construction unions he wants to bolster.


Moreover, Senator Sanders has also co-sponsored legislation like the’ Employ Young Americans Now Act,’ which provided billions in immediate funding to employ one million youth, and included registered apprenticeships as the focus of the spending. But on the other hand Bernie has come up short on good ideas to help black men like he immediately helped other groups. 



Today, if you take a look at just the mid-western United States, you will see in states all across that region that the black male unemployment rate is at alarming numbers, with Illinois being the worst of the bunch. All across American in other states such as New York, Texas, and California the black male unemployment rate is averaging emergency levels. Even after the stimulus packages of Bush, the quantitative easing of Obama, and the dramatic posturing of Trump, the overall unemployment number for black workers as a whole is still double that of white workers in America.


The historic fact that black unemployment has always been double, or even more than double that of white workers, finds its roots in government sponsored chattel slavery.


This constant variable in the labor force has effectively created an economic firewall between black workers aspirations and white workers success, a firewall that has become a silent dog whistle for white moderates such as Bernie Sanders, when he preposterously labels white working class voters as “slaves,” while completely ignoring the true descendants of America’s original sin, BLACK PEOPLE.



The Carpenters union in Philadelphia is attempting to distance itself from an official with one of its local chapters who wore blackface in this year’s Mummers Parade.


Mike Tomaszewski, one of the Froggy Carr Wench Brigade members who painted their faces black during a Gritty-theme performance, is an elected delegate for the 4,000-member Local 158, which represents carpenters who live in the city of Philadelphia. Asked on New Year’s Day why he wore blackface, Tomaszewski said: “'Cause I like it. Yeah, why not? I know it’s a shame to be white in Philly right now."



William C. Sproule, executive secretary-treasurer of the Eastern Atlantic States Regional Council of Carpenters, said in a statement that the union was “disheartened” to learn Tomaszewski was involved in the blackface incident.


“Racism is something our union denounces," Sproule said. "Actions like this counter our union’s mission to be a diverse and inclusive union that provides opportunity for all workers looking for a career in construction. While we cannot control the personal views of a member, we do work to continue to create a culture at all levels that is welcoming to all. We are looking into this matter further.“


Asked if the union was considering taking action against Tomaszewski, Sproule added: “The council is reviewing the conduct and the applicable case law in respect to said conduct.”


Multiple attempts to reach Tomaszewski were unsuccessful.


Even as a majority of Philadelphians identify with racial minority groups, the building trades unions are overwhelmingly white and have long dealt with accusations of racial discrimination. It’s a politically sensitive issue because of the influence wielded by the deep-pocketed trades unions’ in city elections.



“The fact that he’s in a union — and Philadelphia is a city which has a legacy of racism in its unions — is not shocking,” said Tufuku Zuberi, a University of Pennsylvania sociologist who studies race relations. “This union, which is harboring such behavior, needs to be called in question.”


Building trades union leaders have disavowed the overt racism of the past and promised to diversify their workforce. Critics say the progress has been too slow.


The trades unions do not regularly disclose demographic information about their members. A study produced in the Nutter administration found that in 2007, 74% of the trades union workers were white, and 70% lived outside Philadelphia. In 2012, another study found that 76% were white and 67% were suburbanites.


The issue resurfaced recently as City Council members pushed for stronger diversity goals for construction workers who get jobs through the Rebuild program, which uses revenue from Mayor Jim Kenney’s sweetened beverage tax to improve city libraries, parks, and recreation centers.


“I’m not surprised,” Rodney Muhammad, president of the Philadelphia chapter of the NAACP, said when told Tomaszewski was a Carpenters official. “I don’t know if his sentiment comes from being a carpenter. It’s just unfortunate that the trades have had a practice that has been criticized publicly for decades now in the city of Philadelphia.”


Muhammad said he has been working with leaders of the trades on diversity efforts and is hopeful recent initiatives, such as a Carpenters program to consider formerly incarcerated people for apprenticeships, will produce results.


The history of racial exclusion in the trades unions is deeply entwined with the era of minstrelsy, the racist 19th century American form of entertainment that introduced blackface into Philadelphia’s iteration of the medieval European tradition of mummery.


“In effect, the unions became the gateway for ordinary white workers to gain access to a fairly good living in the American society," said Molefi Kete Asante, chairman of Temple University’s Department of Africology and African American Studies. "But at the same time, for most of the history of the unions, it was not the gateway but a closed door to African American workers.”


Walter Licht, a labor historian at the University of Pennsylvania, said he was not surprised to learn one of the Mummers who wore blackface was a union carpenter.


“It doesn’t surprise me, because those legacies have been there, and they have been, in a place like Philadelphia, hard to break. It’s a solidarity, and within those solidarities there’s an ethnic component,” he said. “They’re protective of their union and their community because it’s an incredible ticket.”


CREDITS - This article is was originally posted at The Inquirer by Sean Collins Walsh, Updated 1/10/2020


ADDITIONAL NOTES>>>


William Sproule is the Executive Secretary in charge of the Keystone + Mountain + Lakes Regional Council of Carpenters (KMLRCC). Willie earns $250,000 a year. Willie & the KMLRCC represents more than 40,000 Carpenters in Delaware, District of Columbia, Maryland, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Virginia, West Virginia and 10 North Carolina counties. Over 75% of his Carpenters are white.


Willie helps create and supports Jim Crowe era 'Pre-Apprenticeship Programs' throughout his regions black communities. These 'Pre-Apprenticeship Programs' are designed to block black workers seeking to enter the Carpenters Union by forcing them to complete unnecessary training's and so-called 'Construction Boot Camps' before gaining entry to the same traditional state sponsored Apprenticeship programs as other workers.


Carpenters Union 'Pre-Apprenticeship Programs' effectively create a stone wall that blocks black workers from ever becoming fully vested union members. In Fact, 97% of ALL graduates from a construction 'Pre-Apprenticeship Program' never become Journeyman level tradesmen, and never earn top union pay, nor do they receive retirement benefits. In most cases, black 'Pre-Apprentice' are brokered out to contractors seeking to meet local labor hiring agreements (PLA), these black workers are then paid the lowest industry wages and fired immediately after the projects end - This is called the ONE & DONE Policy.


SHARE THIS ARTICLE - THEN CALL WILLIAM SPROULE @ (412) 922-6200 TELL HIM TO STOP STONE WALLING BLACK WORKERS IN DELAWARE, DC, MARYLAND, VIRGINIA, AND N.CAROLINA, END PRE-APPRENTICESHIPS AND THE ONE & DONE POLICY NOW!!!




Today, operating mostly as an underground, yet still highly relevant and highly effective organization established to maintain white superiority, the 'Knights of the Ku Klux Klan’ (KKK), who were a spin off from the Freemasons after the American Civil is a terrorist group that still has its poisonous tentacles operating secretively in all areas of American government, law enforcement, education, media, and oh yeah, labor. 


In an effort to protect the rights of white working-class Americans from the threat of competition in the workforce from newly freed black American Slaves, who had been the driving force behind American development and economic growth for centuries, the Freemason society and its Klan members established the first labor unions in the United States to sabotage, victimize, and kill black men & women attempting to earn a living after the Civil War.


The most infamous of these unions was the ‘Noble and Holy Order of the Knights of Labor’, later renamed ‘The Knights of Labor’ (KOL), which was the first national industrial union in the United States. Founded in Philadelphia in 1869 by Freemason Baptist Preacher Uriah Stephens, along with eight others, ‘The Knights of Labor’ was established as a platform on which to build white working-class unity. While Freemasonry tended to attract members of the economic elites, especially white merchants, retailers and investors, the ‘Knights of Labor’ membership encompassed all elements of the white working class.


Formed as a secretive organization, the self-proclaimed ‘Grand Master Workman’ Uriah Stephens insisted on a high level of secrecy and fraternalism in order to hide the hands that truly controlled this union. The ‘Knights of Labor’ was such a secretive organization that it was not referred to by name until 1879; ten years after it was founded. Stephens held deep convictions for the rule of secrecy. Stephens aspired to use this newly formed union to unite all white wage-earners into a single organization regardless of skill-sets.



Founded four years after the creation of the ‘Knights of the Ku Klux Klan’, Stephens also stressed the importance of solidarity within the ranks of the ‘Knights of Labor’ in order to facilitate white superiority over black American workers. He felt that the union should be a voluntary group of white men working cooperatively and fraternally to safe guard white worker’s interest.


Although the Knights of Labor did allow by some records 50,000 black workers to join its union after 1883, this exploit was largely used as a tool to degrade the black workforce. The KOL did nothing to address the perils that black workers faced.  By allowing only what they considered the very best black tradesmen and master level artisans to join the KOL this union was successful at controlling the black labor agenda for years to come. 


This KOL method of accepting small amounts of black workers, and separating black workers economically from other black workers performing the same trades, has proved very fruitful for today’s American labor unions. By harnessing some black worker support, the KOL was able to appear to the public as a moderately progressive organization, while spearheading white male dominance over the entire American workforce.


Black tradesmen that became members of the KOL were only allowed to meet separately from white KOL members, in segregated union halls, with white supervision, and had little if any vote on the organizations overall policies.


Black only KOL union members were relegated to work only in black communities, and amongst themselves. In fact, the modern construction industry today in the U.S. finds its historic roots tied to this legacy of castigating black tradesmen to the same effect when implementing so-called ‘Project Labor Agreements’ (PLA) and ‘Local Hire Programs’ primarily targeting black workers. The modern PLA is a direct spin-off from the Knights of Labor racist policies from over 100 year ago. 


Racial divisions within the Knights of Labor were primarily leveraged to prevent unity amongst black working class people and derail collective bargaining efforts, which would have resulted in true economic gains for the black working class.


By allowing select black worker to join its union, mostly masonic blacks, the KOL was able to render black workers ability to organize themselves within their own communities largely futile, because black labor leaders now had less skilled workers to pool from. This separation of black workers resulted in black KOL members ignoring their fellow un-unionized black counterpart’s grave plights of injustice and injuries, in exchange for better pay from their white masters.



It's been said that white supremacist always play both sides of an argument in order to draw victory by any means possible for the white race. While the KKK was the premier ultra-violent right-wing, the KOL was setup to serve as the quintessential blue collar left-wing of the white supremacists Masonic orders of Freemasonry. Both organizations used secret rituals borrowed from Freemasonry when meeting in private.


Whereas the KOL allowed some higher ranking black members from their segregated union halls to attend some of their union conventions and rallies, the Klan was overtly violent toward black workers union or not, only joining with KOL white Protestant workers in political movements that enacted reforms beneficial to the white working class only. Both of these organizations complimented one another by marginalizing recently emancipated black workers to a system that was equal to paid servitude.



Take for example the Thibodaux massacre of 1887 , which killed more than 50 black members of the Knights of Labor, following a three-week strike during the critical sugar harvest season by an estimated 10,000 workers, mostly black, against sugar cane plantations in Louisiana. The strike was the first conducted by the Knights of Labor, who strongly opposed strikes, due to their secret alliances with white elites.



Violence against the black KOL strikers broke out after local white democrat paramilitary Klansmen attacked the unsuspecting black workers and their families in Thibodaux, LA. Although the total number of casualties is unknown, as many as 300 were overall killed, wounded or missing, making it one of the most violent labor disputes in U.S. history. The victims, who were all black, included elders, women and children. 



The Opelousas Courier , a black owned newspaper described the scene:


'Six killed and five wounded' is what the daily papers here say, but from an eye witness to the whole transaction we learn that no less than thirty-five "...fully thirty negroes have sacrificed their lives in the riot on Wednesday..." Negroes were killed outright. Lame men and blind women shot; children and hoary-headed grandsires ruthlessly swept down! The Negroes offered no resistance; they could not, as the killing was unexpected. Those of them not killed took to the woods, a majority of them finding refuge in this city.'


During and even after the Thibodaux massacre the Knights of Labor did nothing to neither protect nor stop violence perpetuated by their democratic Klan brothers against their black union members. 


Albert Pike, who held the office of Chief Justice of the Ku Klux Klan while he was simultaneously Sovereign Grand Commander of the Scottish Rite, Southern Jurisdiction expressed his concept of Masonic brotherhood’s such as the Knights of Labor allowing black members to join:


"I took my obligation to White men, not to Negroes. When I have to accept Negroes as brothers or leave Masonry, I shall leave it."


Historically, the KOL presented itself as an organization committed to seeking major political reforms. Their leaders proposed reforms such as the eight-hour day, the end of child labor, equal pay for equal work, and a national income tax. But, KOL was completely ineffective at protecting or even promoting any initiatives or reforms that would directly benefit American black workers, who at the time were being lynched by the thousands. Black workers could not vote, attend public schools, travel freely, or benefit from the fruits of their labor in any meaningful way.  


The Knights of Labor felt that they had been ordained by god, and that their effort to unite the white working class was a holy endeavor. Stephens expressed his conviction that the "Everlasting Truth sealed by the Grand Architect of the Universe" (God) is that "everything of value, or merit, is the result of creative Industry."


By promoting the KOL as a holy cause, the union was successful at galvanizing white workers that feared they were losing power in the workplace as black workers began to compete for the same jobs. White KOL members were taught that they were the victims of ‘wage slavery’ and unfair ‘labor monopolies’ that consisted largely of black workers being manipulated by white elites.


Similar to today’s skilled trade unions, the ‘Knights of Labor’ fraternal symbolism of white superiority was integrated into every activity of its members and provided them with common patterns of behavior, and a code of conduct. Borrowing from their freemasonry origins the KOL created emblems, and badges that evoked behavioral and psychological responses from its members who looked at themselves as militant protectors of the white working man, and related to one another in the same manner in which the symbols derived, as devout white supremacists. 


In his doctoral dissertation, "Beyond the Veil: The Culture of the Knights of Labor"(UMass:1990) Robert Weir notes,


“By layering of symbol upon symbol, a psychic universe is created in which all parts relate to and define the whole.....Few fraternal orders created transcendental mental landscapes as well as the masons. This is precisely why the Knights of Labor drew so heavily upon Masonic ritual when articulating its own”.(pg. 18)


And, as the first local Master Workman, the first District Master Workman, and the first Grand Master Workman, the highest position in the organization, Stephen created the Knights of Labor’s emblem, an equilateral triangle within a circle, surrounded by a pentagon, and encompassed by an upside down five point star. Stephens embellished the emblem with symbols from the various white supremacists Freemason lodges to which he belonged.



The use of symbolism was very important to the KOL, it acted as a secret code language for it member to communicate their true intentions, while helped to hide from the public their connections to its fellow Klansmen.


The KOL felt that they had to have a public agenda and a private agenda, they strongly opposed labor strikes and boycotts, and they felt it was important to mask the fact that their unions leaders answered directly to the same monopolistic elites they were purportedly fighting. By effectively using symbolism, the KOL was able to rally its white racist base while also clamoring for support from wealthy white masonic elites.


One example of the Knights of labor’s ability to use symbolism as an effective means of organizing was how they would announce their unions meetings. The KOL would chalk symbols on sidewalks and buildings to call meetings, the symbol “8 = 415/1” meant Local Assembly (LA) No. 1 would meet on April 15, at 8 o’clock.


Although the Sugar Cane strikes of 1887 known as the Thibodaux Massacre, which killed and wounded more than 300 black KOL members was the first strike the union had conducted. In its early years, the Knights of Labor strictly opposed the use of strikes and boycotts against industrialists.


However, as the KOL grew, its new white members and local leaders gradually began to realize that they were being manipulated and used by their own union leaders as pawns; they began to radicalize the organization. By the mid-1880s, its member base began to organize labor stoppages.


The KOL white member base won important strikes to move the needle for white workers , such as on the Union Pacific in 1884, and the Wabash Railroad in 1885.



However, failures in the Missouri Pacific strike in 1886 and the Haymarket Square Riot of the same year that killed 7 police officers and 4 civilians after KOL members bombed the event, proved to be a fateful blow to the union . Although no KOL member was arrested for the bombing, in the public mind, demands by the KOL and their radically violent white caused the public to see the terms "unionism" and "anarchism" as synonymous of one another.


By the beginning of 1886, the Knights of Labor had over 1 million members across the United States, and Canada, and had chapters also in Great Britain and Australia.  Those successful strikes during the mid-1880s led to the Knights of Labor's growth. As the strikes proved successful, more workers flocked to the union movement.


But, due to the Knights of Labor's upper leaderships continued opposition to strikes, and the leaders allegiance to wealthy masonic elites and industrialist, the organization experienced declining membership by the late 1880s and the early 1900s.


And as lingering Klan sympathies among its union members became more prevalent, disgruntled KOL members began to establish and join other bigoted white supremacist labor unions, such as the United Brotherhood of Carpenters (UBC), established in 1881, the American Federation of Labor (AFL), established in 1886, the International brotherhood of Electrical workers, established in 1891, Laborers' International Union of North American (LIUNA), established in 1903, and International Brotherhood of Teamsters, also established in 1903, who refer to themselves as the ‘Knights of the Highway.’ 


As KOL members began migrating to newly founded labor unions that they felt better served their interest, such as the AFL-CIO that used KKK style violence, and intimidation against black workers, and as KOL union membership began to dwindle on paper, the Knights of Labor’s leadership and their Freemason puppet masters realized that it would be far more beneficial to realign itself with Klan values as well, as it became a part of what the Klan describes as the ‘invisible empire.’


Although the Knight of Labor was dissolved in 1949, we can still see the influence that secret societies like Freemasonry still have in today's labor union and labor movements. History tells us that as black workers we must stay alert to its secretive methods, and eliminate union leadership who promise much and deliver little.





advertisement
`